While.

Compare

How While. compares.

Most tools in this space watch an agent and tell you what broke. While. is a mid-training and post-training platform: the open-source SDK builds and optimizes a dataset from the traces, an open model is trained on it with SFT and RL, and the gain is measured on a held-out set. Each page below says what the other tool does well, with sources.

Why you need While.

Monitoring tells you the agent failed. It does not make the agent stop failing.

The fix is a change to the model. That takes three things: training data from the failures, a training run, and a held-out evaluation with an interval on the difference.

While. does all three. The other tools on this page stop at the red check.

A scoreA model you serve
HarborRaindropJudgment LabsLangChainTRLSkyRLprime-rlWhile.
Tasks someone wroteYour agent's traffic
Across: what the test starts from. Up: what you hold at the end. Our reading of each tool's public pages, dated on its comparison. Tell us if we put you in the wrong spot.

While. vs Raindrop

Raindrop finds problems in a running agent. While. learns from production traces and continuously improves the model with mid-training and post-training SFT and RL.

Read the comparison

While. vs Judgment Labs

Judgment Labs finds the failure and measures how often it happens. While. learns from production traces and continuously improves the model with mid-training and post-training SFT and RL.

Read the comparison

While. vs Harbor

Harbor scores agents on tasks someone wrote. While. learns from production traces and continuously improves the model with mid-training and post-training SFT and RL.

Read the comparison

While. vs LangChain

LangSmith watches the agent and edits its prompts and code. While. learns from production traces and continuously improves the model with mid-training and post-training SFT and RL.

Read the comparison

Missing one? Email hello@while.ai and we will add it.